The Women’s Charter prohibits domestic violence.[21] Both Muslims and non-Muslims apply for Personal Protection Orders against those who commit family violence in the civil courts, and prosecutions for breaches of protection orders are heard in criminal courts.[22] The Syariah court is not empowered to hear applications for protection orders or applications related to domestic violence.[23] However, the limited definition of “family member” in the civil law has meant that a single woman cannot file for a protection order against her partner who she has been cohabitating with.[24]
The Government has also reportedly provided crisis shelters, medical treatment, psychological support, counselling and financial aid to victims of abuse, regardless of nationality.
[25] Although women’s groups have noted that the demand for shelter spaces is not being met, due to lack of funding.
[26] Additionally, a Code of Practice for the Investigation of Family Violence has been developed, and a Family Violence Mandatory Counselling Programme for perpetrators has been established.
[27]
Nevertheless, domestic violence continues to be a significant problem in Singapore. There is no official prevalence data on family violence; however the US State Department reports that during 2013 there were 3,072 applications for personal protection orders.
[28] The 2009 International Violence against Women Survey found that, of those women who experienced violence from a partner, 42% reported that they felt their life was in danger, 46% were physically injured, 29% needed medical care and 28% considered the incident “very serious”. Where the perpetrator of violence was a partner, only 13% of victims sought assistance from a specialised agency and 71% did not report the incident to the police. The study found that Malay women were more vulnerable to violence compared to Indian women.
[29]
Additionally, migrant women are even further vulnerable to domestic violence. The Star Shelter, run by the Singapore Council of Women‘s Organisations, has seen the number of foreign brides seeking help increase from 4 or 5% a year to 10% a year in the years 2009-2011.
[30]
The Ministry of Community Development, Youth and Sports commissioned a study to gather public perception on their awareness of family violence in 2002-2003. This study showed that more media publicity was needed to increase awareness of family violence. Subsequently, the government embarked upon public education through advertisements and editorial write-ups in newspapers and magazines. The follow-up study conducted in 2007 indicated positive shifts in public perceptions of family violence. The public became less tolerant towards spousal violence compared to 2003. More respondents felt strongly that physical violence was an unacceptable part of married life and would count slapping, pushing, and threatening to hurt a spouse as acts of abuse regardless of the frequency of occurrence. More respondents were also aware of what constitutes emotional violence, suggesting that there is heightened awareness of the protection offered under the law.
[31]
Rape is prohibited by the Penal Code, punishable by imprisonment of up to 20 years and caning.
[32] Spousal rape is not a specific crime, but in 2008 the government introduced an amendment removing the blanket immunity for married partners, making it an offence for a husband to engage in non-consensual sexual intercourse in the case that the husband and wife are separated and living apart or if the wife has a protection order.
[33] These exceptions have been criticized by NGO groups for not going far enough to protect women who are not officially separated from their partner.
[34]
NGOs have identified significant limitations to the implementation of the sexual violence law, including negative gender stereotyping on behalf of the judiciary and police; and the fact that forensic evidence, such as rape kits, are only collected at the discretion of police.
[35] In addition, the Evidence Act allows for evidence of the immortal character of the victim to be introduced during trial to impeach the credibility of the witness.
[36] The US State Department notes that in 2012, at least 20 persons were charged for rape, 7 were convicted, 2 were acquitted, and 11 were awaiting trial.
[37] However, these figures may be affected by under-reporting. The International Violence against Women Survey of 2006 women, conducted in 2009 by the National University of Singapore, found that 7% of women aged 18 to 69 had experienced physical violence in their lifetime, and 4% had experienced sexual violence.
[38]
Sexual harassment can be charged under various laws, including the ‘outrage of modesty’ provision under the Penal Code and the Miscellaneous Offences (Public Order & Nuisance) Act.
[39] ‘Outrage of Modesty’ is defined as an assault or use of criminal force on any person with the intent to, or the knowledge that it may, outrage the modesty of that person.
[40] However, local women’s groups have called for the introduction of specific legislation to outlaw sexual harassment, as well as dedicated mechanisms to implement the law, and have noted the lack of research and data collection on the prevalence of the problem.
[41]
There is no evidence to suggest that female genital mutilation (FGM) is practiced in Singapore.
More
Limitations on women’s reproductive rights also infringe upon women’s physical integrity in Singapore. The Abortion Act of 1974 provides that
abortion is permitted when a pregnancy is terminated by a registered physician acting on the request of a pregnant woman and with her written consent during the first 24 weeks of pregnancy. Beyond that time, an abortion may be performed only if immediately necessary to save the life or prevent grave permanent injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman.
[42] Contraceptive supplies and information provided by the Ministry of Health as well as public and private doctors were readily available.
[43] There is no current data on the percentage of married women using contraception.
Trafficking in persons takes place on a significant scale in Singapore, but largely goes unrecognized at the official level.
[44] NGOs have reported that migrant workers, the majority of which are women, face deception regarding the nature or salary of their work, confiscation of their passport, restriction of movement, or physical and sexual abuse
[45]: all of which have been identified as indicators of potential trafficking.
[46] Singapore has enacted anti-trafficking laws, and temporary protection visas have been extended to civil actions to allow the victims to claim compensation.
[47] However the US State Department reported in 2013 that the Government of Singapore does not fully comply with the minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking, although it is making significant efforts to do so.
[48] In particular, women’s groups have criticized the anti-trafficking laws for failing to recognize that a person may be trafficked without the use of physical coercion.
[49]
[21] CEDAW (2009), p.13 [22] SCWO CEDAW Report (2011), p.13 [23] Women’s Charter 1961, Arts. 64 and 65 [24] Women’s Charter 1961, Art 64 [25] SCWO CEDAW Report (2011), p.32 [26] AWARE (2011), p.165 [27] AWARE (2011), p.164 [28] US State Department (2013) [29] SAFV-NUS (2010) [30] AWARE (2011), p.159 [31] CEDAW (2009) p.83 [32] US State Department (2013) [33] AWARE (2011), p.160 [34] AWARE (2011), p.160 [35] AWARE (2011), p.161 [36] AWARE (2011), p.161 [37] US State Department (2013) [38] SAFV-NUS (2010) [39] Penal Code, Sec.509; Miscellaneous Offences (Public Order and Nuisance) Act, Sec.13 A-B [40] US State Department (2013) [41] AWARE (2011), p.95 [42] UN (2011) [43] US State Department (2013) [44] Transient Workers Count too and the Global Alliance Against Traffic in Women (2011), p.4 [45] SCWO CEDAW Report (2011), p.27 [46] US State Department (2013b) [47] SCWO, p.27 [48] US State Department (2013b) [49] Transient Workers Count too and the Global Alliance Against Traffic in Women (2011), p.4